Page 57 - 106年消防月刊1月號(全)

Work Discussion 工作研討

深耕計畫執行前後

對地方區公所災害防救能力影響分析

―以新北市為例

Analysis of township/district office disaster prevention and rescue
capability before and after the implementation of the Deep Cultivation

Plan -the example of New Taipei City

■文╱新北市政府消防局 詹佳祥
■圖╱詹佳祥提供

一、前言

內政部消防署推行災害防救深耕計畫歷經 2 期共 6 年，並期望在協力機構協助下，鄉（鎮、
市、區）公所之災害防救單位能提升並擁有足夠之防災素養與能力，以順遂進行災害防救相關工
作的協調、整合、督導與落實。

新北市自 91 年開始對各公所災害應變中心軟硬體建置與各項防災減災整備作為進行評核。
迄今，歷經升格準直轄市、升格直轄市、烏來改制為原住民自治區等組織變革，加上近年陸續推
動災害防救深耕計畫、社區防災等政策。本報告探究深耕計畫對於區公所災害防救能力之影響，

故蒐集 98 年（深耕計畫執行前）至 105 年（深耕第 2 期即將結束）各區公所災害防救業務評核
成績進行比較分析，並針對 105 年評核之特色、成績與項目做檢討與提出建議。

Analysis of township/district office disaster prevention and rescue capability before and after the
implementation of the Deep Cultivation Plan -the example of New Taipei City
The NFA implemented the Disaster Prevention and Rescue Deep Cultivation Plan over six years in two
stages. It was hoped that, with the assistance of supporting agencies, district office disaster prevention
and rescue unit capability would be raised and they would thus be given sufficient disaster prevention
and rescue literacy and capability to allow disaster prevention and rescue work coordination, integration,
supervision, and implementation to be smoothly carried out.
In 2003, New Taipei City began evaluating the disaster response center system and facility establishment
and disaster prevention and mitigation preparations of its district offices. Since then, the city’s
organizational changes have included Taipei County becoming the Special Municipality New Taipei City
and Wulai becoming an indigenous autonomous area, and also the Disaster Prevention and Rescue Deep
Cultivation Plan and community disaster prevention policy, and other policies, have been implemented in
recent years. This report analyzes the effect of the Deep Cultivation Plan on the disaster prevention and
rescue capability of the city’s district offices. The disaster prevention and rescue operation performance
evaluation results of the district offices from 2009 （before the plan’s implementation（ to 2016 （after the
2nd phase ended（ were collected and compared. The characteristics of the 2016 evaluation, results and
items are reviewed and related suggestions are put forward.

消防月刊 2017.1 55